Talk:Janusz Zajdel

Janusz Zajdel has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 7, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Poland Mid‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Mid‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Translation issues and appropriateness

I don't know if any of his books were translated into English; i am not sure even if Englishmen would find interesting his books, or even if they would be able to understand them (otoh, 1984 was written by a guy who never lived in totalitarian system :) ). (heh, on the another other hand apart from allusions to Polish reality his books are quite good hard-sf books - like cylinder van troffa or full truth about planet ksi ...

Is this argument gainst putting him into wikipedia? If so, i am open to discussion szopen

Only one of his short stories has been translated into English. Ausir 11:07, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Translated into English

I am afraid that so far only this short story has been translated.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 04:15, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Janusz Zajdel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wugapodes (talk · contribs) 03:14, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Will review. Wugapodes (talk) 03:14, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Comments

"On 19 July 1985, after three years' struggle against the disease, he died of lung cancer" The lung cancer bit should come first.
Done. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Increasingly visible theme in his works was the concern over dangers inherent in attempts to control the human society." I'm unclear what this sentence means. Since he's not writing, how can there be an "increasingly visible" theme?
I meant, compared to his early works. I hope the current wording makes it more clear. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"has been described" by whom? See WP:WEASEL
But the sentence is clearly referenced. I've added a quotation. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The "Awards" section could have the prose tightened but it's not enough to quarrel over in a GA review.
The article relies very heavily on a singular source. This may cause problems later on but, from the looks of it, it seems to be rather comprehensive. Maybe work on getting more sources, perhaps off-line.
- @Wugapodes: For GA+ levels, I agree we should try to expand it; but frankly I was not able to locate better sources (if I could, I'd have added them to Further Reading). There is some material in introductions and such, written to his novels by other writers, particularly in the editions after his death. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Results

On Hold for 7 days pending changes.

Listed after the changes made. I would suggest trying to find some of those introductions and maybe incorporate them into the article to make it more comprehensive, especially if you're going for FA. Keep up the good work! Wugapodes (talk) 15:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Janusz Zajdel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]